The Most Common Message Body. ▫ Be session information describing the media to be exchanged between the parties. ▫ SDP, RFC (initial publication). Simply the doesn’t understand this extension. A lot of SIP/WebRTC/ SDP software don’t have support for this. Instead of using the. M. Handley and V. Jacobson, “SDP: Session Description Protocol,” RFC , IETF Network Working Group, , April
|Published (Last):||27 November 2016|
|PDF File Size:||7.90 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.59 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Should we suggest people stay away from non-alpha-numerics in attribute names? In this case, the text would seem to override the BNF, at least for X. Retrieved from ” https: From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. In reality, RFC is self-contradictory and unclear in a number of places, and rfcc implementations rely on a large number of extensions and interpretations of the standard. The text also says to ignore unknown atributes, but that assumes you’ve been able to parse the attribute name.
And why was a name chosen that might break backwards compatibility? Therefore the use of attribute names containing “-” is problematic for RFC implementations as several examples of attribute names containing “-” were registered prior to the definition of RFC Join Stack Overflow to learn, share knowledge, and build your career.
List of RFCs
I guess those who have tfc the drafts wouldn’t be happy though: Network News Transfer Protocol. If I try to parse the following sdp with help of Microsoft.
Simple Authentication and Security Layer. If I have one stream which carries optional ‘repair’ data for another stream, and I want to send them on two separate multicast groups, or two separate streams to an RTSP client, how would I indicate that ‘this media stream’ is the repair data for ‘that media stream’ in SDP? In reply to this post by David Singer. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google.
RFC – SDP: Session Description Protocol
Houston, we have a problem. Open Shortest Path First. RFCwhile not perfect, greatly clarifies the text to fix those problems, and to reflect existing practice. Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol. If you are referring to the general case as H.
IETF – mmusic – Comparison of SDP variants between RFC and RFC
Tuesday, June 05, 8: Adam Wright 4. Adam Dave Singer wrote: All says about it is: I agree such issues should be documented.
Pages using RFC magic links. Hello Dan, Are you referring to additional differences between the grammar of attribute names or differences between the RFC and RFC syntax in general?
Rtc doesn’t understand this extension. Search everywhere only in this topic. Colin On 5 Junat Views Read Edit View history. From looking at the IANA registrations the widespread use of “-” seems to be a relatively recent phenomena. Monday, June 04, In reply to this post by Christian Groves-2 On 5 Junat This page was last edited on 27 Septemberat Sure, but there’s still an issue here, or at least something needing clarification: IP over Avian Carriers.
Real Time Streaming Protocol. 22327
Comparison of SDP variants between RFC 4566 and RFC 2327
TryParse encodedText, 0, encodedText. I can only expect that was the intent, yes. Might want to ping the authors first to make sure that was their intent. RFC allows ‘-‘ and a lot of other characters in attribute names. Hello Colin, Thanks for the extra information.